Latest News

Latest News Contact Us Today - 818.783.5757

News

Civil Rights

[03/09] Texas judge rescinds anti-death penalty ruling
[03/09] Washington weddings begin for same-sex couples
[03/09] A policy change on abortion, but how radical?
[03/09] Archbishop defends decision on lesbians' children
[03/08] Accused Ga. killer uses creative legal argument

More...

Consumer Products

[03/09] Epson Announces Two High-Volume Business Color Ink Jet Printers for Workgroups and Network Printing Environments
[03/09] Prius driver's 911 call: 'My car can't slow down'
[03/09] Publix Super Markets recalls some seasoning mixes
[03/09] Manufacturer expands pet food recall
[03/09] Govt to warn on baby slings because of deaths

More...

Employment Practices

[03/09] Senate to take up unemployment insurance extension
[03/08] Allergan CEO got $11.1M in compensation in 2009
[03/08] Court will decide if NASA checks can continue
[03/04] Jobless claims drop, productivity revised higher
[03/04] No is no: More men file sexual harassment claims

More...

Litigation

[03/09] Prius driver's 911 call: 'My car can't slow down'
[03/09] Feds to probe cause of runaway Prius in California
[03/08] Stay tuned: More fee disputes over local TV coming
[03/08] Tax season bringing out the fraud artists
[03/08] Court will hear case about vaccine side effects

More...

Personal Injury

[03/09] SUV backs into Mich. school; 6 students injured
[03/09] Superintendent accidentally fires gun during class
[03/09] Park, slain trainer's family want video suppressed
[03/09] Hoped-for drop in childbirth deaths not happening
[03/09] Ohio State janitor's gunfire kills co-worker, self

More...

Product Liability

[03/09] Manufacturer expands pet food recall
[03/09] Prius with stuck accelerator glides to safe stop
[03/08] Roche suspends arthritis drug study after deaths
[03/08] Toyota disputes critic who blames electronics
[03/05] Australian court: Vioxx doubled heart attack risk

More...

Top Headlines

[03/09] TV producer admits attempting Letterman shakedown
[03/09] Ohio gunman recently learned he was being fired
[03/09] Pa. woman charged with recruiting jihadists online
[03/09] Legal fallout continues from Coyotes bankruptcy
[03/09] Texas judge rescinds anti-death penalty ruling

More...

Tort

[03/09] Prius with stuck accelerator glides to safe stop
[03/09] Superintendent accidentally fires gun during class
[03/09] Park, slain trainer's family want video suppressed
[03/09] Manufacturer expands pet food recall
[03/09] Hoped-for drop in childbirth deaths not happening

More...

Case Summaries

Civil Rights

[03/09] Zia Trust Co. v. Montoya
In an action for excessive force brought by family members of a man defendant-officer shot and killed while responding to a domestic disturbance, denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity is affirmed where the court could not say that a van fifteen feet away, which according to the plaintiffs was clearly stuck on a pile of rocks, gave defendant probable cause to believe that there was a threat of serious physical harm to himself or others that would justify his use of force.

[03/09] Espinosa v. City & County of San Francisco
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action claiming excessive force by defendants-officers, denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity is affirmed where: 1) defendants failed to show as a matter of law that plaintiff's decedent did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy; 2) the district court properly found that defendants failed to show as a matter of law that the emergency and exigency exceptions to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement applied; 3) defendants failed to show that there were no questions of fact regarding whether a security guard had apparent authority to consent and implied consent; and 4) the district court did not err in finding that there were genuine issues of fact regarding whether the officers intentionally or recklessly provoked a confrontation.

[03/09] Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n v. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch.
In an employment discrimination and retaliation action brought by a teacher at a religious school claiming violations of the ADA, the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant based on the "ministerial exception" is vacated and remanded as, given the factual findings relating to plaintiff's primary duties as a teacher, the district court erred in its legal conclusion classifying her as a ministerial employee.

[03/09] Redd v. Wright
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action arising out of plaintiff inmate's confinement in tuberculosis hold following his refusal to submit to tuberculosis testing, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) prior precedent did not "clearly foreshadow" a holding that the testing policy, as applied in this case, violated plaintiff's Free Exercise rights; 2) it could not reasonably be said that defendants acted in violation of clearly established Eighth Amendment law by implementing the policy; and 3) it was not clearly established that plaintiff was entitled to some kind of notice that religious objectors could be exempt from the policy.

[03/08] McBeth v. Himes
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action arising out of an investigation by the sheriff's office and the Colorado Department of Human Services that resulted in plaintiff surrendering her license to run a daycare facility in Colorado, partial summary judgment based on qualified immunity to defendant-officials is affirmed in part where: 1) plaintiff voluntarily relinquished her license before any suspension proceedings could take place; and 2) defendants made a prima facie showing that they acted objectively reasonably when they sought suspension of plaintiff's daycare license. However, the order is reversed in part where plaintiff failed to allege and prove that the state officials lacked cause to seek suspension of her license.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.